Science is the poetry of Nature.
Contributing Authors
Posts tagged "dinosaurs"

Oldest Dinosaur Embryos Discovered

By Azadeh Ansari, CNN: Everyone knows dinosaurs were gigantic, but they grew from tiny embryos just like birds do. What were these extinct reptiles like at this early stage of development?

Scientists have found some new clues that could shed light on this age-old mystery.

In a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature, scientists said they have discovered the oldest known collection of fossilized dinosaur embryos.

“In a way, I think we have set a new standard for dinosaur embryology,” said paleontologist Robert Reisz, the lead study author.

Scientists found these dinosaurs grew extremely fast in comparison to present-day living animals and even flexed their muscles while still in the egg.

The bigger the spaces between primary bone cavities, the faster an animal grows. These bone cavities house soft tissue responsible for blood vessel generation.

“In other animals, about 15% to 45% of the embryo bone tissue is made up of these soft tissue cavities; in these dinosaur fossil samples, we found the cavities to make up roughly 60% of the bone tissue,” Reisz said.

Click here to read the article in full.

sagansense:

Huge Volcano Eruptions May Have Caused The Die-Off That Paved The Way For Dino Domination

The Triassic die-off is one of 5 mass extinctions on Earth in the past 542 million years.

Excavating Evidence of A Great Extinction Along sea cliffs in southern England, geologist Paul Olsen of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory samples rocks from near the 201,564,000-year Triassic extinction boundary. Kevin Krajick/Earth Institute

We all know a gigantic asteroid is to blame for wiping out the dinosaurs—but what wiped out the animals that came before them? A changed climate, brought about by devastating volcanic eruptions, may have cleared the way.

New research strengthens the argument that more than 200 million years ago, massive volcano eruptions spewed gargantuan amounts of noxious gas into the atmosphere, causing catastrophic global warming and acidification of the oceans.

About 76 percent of the life forms on Earth perished, in a terrible die-off known as the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event. It wasn’t as bad as the Permian-Triassic Great Dying some 50 million years prior, but it was bad enough that half the species living on this planet disappeared. With plenty of new ecological niches to fill, dinosaurs took over the Earth for the next 135 million years.

Scientists have suspected that mega-volcanism and resulting climate change may have played a role in all this, but it was difficult to show correlation. Now researchers have the tightest link yet: A new date for the End Triassic Extinction at 201,564,000 years ago, exactly the same time as a massive outpouring of lava across all the land.
“This may not quench all the questions about the exact mechanism of the extinction itself. However, the coincidence in time with the volcanism is pretty much ironclad,” coauthor Paul Olsen, a geologist at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory who has been investigating the boundary since the 1970s, said in a statement.

This happened when all the land on Earth was connected in a megacontinent. The titanic eruptions caused a rift in this continent that ballooned into the Atlantic Ocean. Now, evidence for the cataclysm can be seen in North America, South America and Africa. Olsen took a chunk of rock from the Hudson River Palisades, a few hundred yards from the New Jersey side of the George Washington Bridge. Below, a basalt deposit near a retirement home in Clifton, N.J., shows the lava flow in gray and sedimentary rocks—signaling the extinction—in red.

Evidence of Extinction: In Clifton, New Jersey, a massive basalt flow (black rock on left) from the time of the End Triassic is exposed in a former quarry, now located behind a retirement home. Reddish sedimentary rocks signaling the extinction itself lie to the far right. Paul Olsen/Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

The team was not looking for fossils per se, but evidence of changes that set the stage for dinosaurs. They were able to date sedimentary deposits with great precision, matching them to certain kinds of crystals found in ancient lavas. This technique set new constraints on the die-off, and found it matches right up with the evidence of volcanism.

The actual mechanism of death is not as clear, however. Climate change is the most likely culprit, caused by massive belchings of sulfur, carbon dioxide and other toxins into the atmosphere. Acidic oceans, which would have hampered the ability of many creatures to produce their shells, is another possible explanation. The study appears today in Science.

sagansense:

New Lizard Species Look Like Evil Dinosaur Hybrids

If these lizards were larger, they’d look like featherless dinosaurs: With spiky spines and gleaming red eyes, two newly described species of wood lizard look a bit like stegosaur-evil velociraptor hybrids.

Distribution of Enyalioides azulae and Enyalioides binzayedi in Peru. The red circle indicates the type (and only currently known) locality of both species. (From Venegas, et al.)

The lizards, reported Mar. 15 in ZooKeys, live in the Peruvian mountains and belong to the genus Enyalioides, which includes 10 previously described species. After comparing the lizards’ morphology and genetic sequences with known wood lizards, a team of scientists concluded that they could add two new members to a group most commonly found in Central and South America.

One of the lizards is now named E. azulae, after the Cordillera Azul mountain range in northeastern Peru, where it was first discovered in 2010. The 10-centimeter long lizard lives in montane forests at 1,100 meters elevation, near the Rio Huallaga basin. Males are flecked with bright green, while females are more dusty brown and resemble juveniles in color.

The other newly described lizard is E. binzayedi, after Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the United Arab Emirates, who created a conservation fund to support international conservation projects. This 12-centimeter long lizard bears more pronounced dorsal spikes, and is more colorful, than E. azulae — though not as colorful as E. rubrigularis, another species described by several of the same authors in 2009.

Stay Curious! View More Here

Asker luckyboots Asks:
Regarding your post "A Velociraptor Without Feathers Isn’t a Velociraptor ": I have a way for them to do featherless dinosaurs in the JP sequel and still maintain scientific dignity. The original dinosaurs were bred with frog DNA to fill in missing gaps. That's why they don't grow feathers! They should drop that line.
scinerds scinerds Said:

Hello! I’m the admin who posted the Jurassic Park story.

You’ve got a great point! I talked a bit about the Jurassic Park/feather saga on my Tumblr a few days back before I posted the Velociraptor post on scinerds. The great thing about creative licensing is that you can stretch back to the truth, if that makes sense. Could there have been other experiments happening on the islands that we never knew about (never discussed in books or films)? Perhaps they did some experiments with bird DNA, or due to the fact they ended up thriving when they shouldn’t have, they just continued to evolve and mutate! In Jurassic Park III, the raptors had a little bit of protofeather decoration, which could be nice foreshadowing. There is so much they can do either way - whether they end up decorating some new/old dinosaurs as they are now known to have existed, or use the frog DNA as a reason they did not grow feathers.

I do believe that dropping a few explanations on their appearances in the film would be a good way to explain why they are the way they are. Definitely a lot they can do, so I’m excited to see Jurassic Park IV nonetheless.

abluegirl:

Dinosaur-killing space rock ‘was a comet’

Scientists believe that the object that hit the earth 65 million years ago, triggering the extinction of the dinosaurs, was a comet, not an asteroid.  Comets are typically smaller, but faster moving than asteroids.  This one resulted in the 180-km wide Chicxulub crater in Mexico, and would have triggered the global environmental change that caused the extinction event.  Here’s more from BBC News:

The space rock gave rise to a global layer of sediments enriched in the chemical element iridium, in concentrations much higher than naturally occurs; it must have come from outer space.

However, in the first part of their work, the team suggests that frequently quoted iridium values are incorrect. Using a comparison with another extraterrestrial element deposited in the impact - osmium - they were able to deduce that the collision deposited less debris than has previously been supposed.

The recalculated iridium value suggests a smaller body hit the Earth. So for the second part of their work, the researchers took the new figure and attempted to reconcile it with the known physical properties of the Chicxulub impact.

For this smaller space rock to have produced a 180km-wide crater, it must have been travelling relatively quickly. The team found that a long-period comet fitted the bill much better than other possible candidates.

“You’d need an asteroid of about 5km diameter to contribute that much iridium and osmium. But an asteroid that size would not make a 200km-diameter crater,” said Dr Moore.

“So we said: how do we get something that has enough energy to generate that size of crater, but has much less rocky material? That brings us to comets.”

Full Article

National Geographic: A Velociraptor Without Feathers Isn’t a Velociraptor by Brian Switek

Jurassic Park is the greatest dinosaur movie of all time. Aside from being an exceptionally entertaining adventure, the film introduced audiences to dinosaurs that had never been seen before – hybrids of new science and bleeding-edge special effects techniques. The active, alert, and clever dinosaurs that paleontologists had recently pieced together were revived by way of exquisite puppetry and computer imagery, instantly replacing the old images of dinosaurs as swamp-dwelling dullards. Despite the various scientific nitpicks and some artistic license overreach – let’s not talk about the “Spitter” -  Jurassic Park showed how science and cinema could collaborate to create something truly majestic. That’s why it’s so disappointing to hear the the next Jurassic Park sequel is going to turn its back on a critical aspect of dinosaur lives. In Jurassic Park 4, the film’s director has stated, there will be no feathery dinosaurs.

Read the full post on National Geographic.

Isle of Wight girl Daisy Morris has flying prehistoric beast named after her
Daisy Morris, an amateur fossil hunter from the Isle of Wight, discovered some “bones sticking out of the sand” in 2009, when she was four years old. The fossil turned out to be a previously discovered genus of small petrosaur from the Lower Cretaceous period.  The dinosaur has since been named after her, Vectidraco daisymorrisae. Her mum says: “She has a very good eye for tiny little fossils and found these tiny little black bones sticking out of the mud and decided to dig a bit further and scoop them all out. We are all very proud of her”.
The fossil has since been donated to the Natural History Museum . You can read more about Daisy and her discovery @BBC.

Isle of Wight girl Daisy Morris has flying prehistoric beast named after her

Daisy Morris, an amateur fossil hunter from the Isle of Wight, discovered some “bones sticking out of the sand” in 2009, when she was four years old. The fossil turned out to be a previously discovered genus of small petrosaur from the Lower Cretaceous period.  The dinosaur has since been named after her, Vectidraco daisymorrisae. Her mum says: “She has a very good eye for tiny little fossils and found these tiny little black bones sticking out of the mud and decided to dig a bit further and scoop them all out. We are all very proud of her”.

The fossil has since been donated to the Natural History Museum . You can read more about Daisy and her discovery @BBC.

crownedrose:

blamoscience:

Drawing Tyrannosaurus – You’re Probably Doing it Wrong

This is a wonderful article on such a critical topic in the palaeontology world - but it doesn’t end there. The general public’s take on dinosaurs is highly influenced by good and bad media.

“Pterodactyls” is a good example of a bad influence for a multitude of reasons. One reason is because any “flying dinosaur” is usually called a pterodactyl in the media, but in reality they are not flying dinosaurs and nor is pterodactyl the correct name for these animals. Pterosaurs is the correct term for the flying reptiles that lived in the Mesozoic Era, and the genus for the specific pterosaur is Pterodactylus. There’s also the constant error of using T-rex/T-Rex, and T Rex/T rex. I’ve seen it mostly done incorrectly as T-rex whereas it is correctly spelled T. rex. (If you look in the comments on the article, most of them say “T-Rex”). Just like pterodactyl, it has been so ingrained in the media that it’s hard to get people to listen or learn the correct way to identify an animal. When such incorrect terms are used in film, television, news, etc, viewers will then believe it is correct because they [the media] wouldn’t mess those things up, right?

Even in today’s age with so much technology, scientific studies, and fossils, CGI dinosaurs (+ others) and the general information on (but not limited to) palaeontology in the entertainment industry seem to get lost when transferred to the screen. This doesn’t happen to every feature mind you, but there is a lot out there that has a major influence on the population that is not 100% correct. Let’s face it though, it’s hard to be 100% accurate when we’re finding out new things every day, haha! Even though CGI, effects, and scenes may be impressive, people in the field will see faults whereas the general public may not. This is frustrating seeing as we want to promote correct information, not take steps backwards. Jurassic Park is such a staple in the dinosaur world, but we all know the issues… especially with the Velociraptor. Yet if you go ask someone on the street to draw or describe the dromaeosaurid, they’d most likely identify the ones you see in JP.

There is a lot going on - and not just in palaeontology - that will always need people to help bring the correct information to the table. Like the article said, looking into what most take to be accurate, how can we bounce off those and show how awesome they really are? It’s definitely possible, and it’s just finding your footing on how to go about it.

As well, no matter if it’s media or a palaeontologist’s article you’re reading, it is always good to cross check sources, read books, studies, attend lectures, speak to others, and just keep on learning. I have dozens of books on palaeontology and geology, and have read many studies as well as been involved in lectures, festivals, etc. It’s not only informative, but fun to do some detective work and learn from another.

Tiny, Feathery Dinosaur Raises Jurassic Questions Like ‘Can I Clone It and Keep It?’

Known by many paleontologists as cutie-pieous rex.. No but seriously:

When paleontologists began discovering feathery dinosaurs during the 1990s, every find was a tantalizing glimpse at possibilities that researchers had based on bone. Now, almost seventeen years since the Sinosauropteryx splash, fluffy dinosaurs seem almost mundane. Finding yet another small, bird-like, fuzzy dinosaur doesn’t spur the same excitement that earlier discoveries did. This is not to say that these new finds are not important. Quite the contrary. With every new feathered dinosaur named, paleontologists uncover a little more context for ongoing discussions about the evolution of flight, feathers, and birds. The latest fluffy dinosaur to join the ranks – Eosinopteryx brevipenna.

Found by a commercial collector in the roughly 161 million year old stone of northeastern China’s Tiaojishan Formation, the tiny dinosaur is preserved as a virtually complete skeleton. Encircled by feather fossils, the 30 cm long dinosaur lies with its arms held out and legs bent. The theropod almost looks like it’s ready to take off running, except for the fact that the dinosaur’s head is slightly detached from the vertebral column.

Described by Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences paleontologist Pascal Godefroit and coauthors in Nature Communications, Eosinopteryx is the third fluffy dinosaur known from the same deposits. The skeletally-similar Anchiornis and Xiaotingia have both been found in Tiaojishan Formation and supposedly lived around the same time. (How old these dinosaurs are, and whether they were contemporaries, is a tricky question made all the more complicated by the fact that these specimens are often purchased from commercial dealers who do not rigorously record geological information about the fossils.) Could Eosinopteryx be an Anchiornis by another name? Godefroit and colleagues argue against synonymy, citing plumage as the key difference.

Compared to Anchiornis and other closely-related feathered dinosaurs within a group called deinonychosaurs, Eosinopteryx seemed to be missing feathers. Whereas Anchiornis had long pennaceous feathers along the tail, ankles, and feet, Eosinopteryx lacked these specialized features. Rather than being a quirk of preservation, Godefroit and coauthors argue, Eosinopteryx seems to lack these feathers because they weren’t actually there. The fact that delicate, plume-like feathers were preserved on the dinosaur’s tail, for example, hints that the dinosaur’s anatomy is preserved to such a high degree that pennaceous feathers would have turned up had they been present.

The researchers also doubt that the difference in feather types was the result of changes during growth. Based upon the degree of fusion between certain bones in the skeleton, Godefroit and collaborators hypothesize that the lone Eosinopteryx specimen was a subadult or adult when it perished. The paleontologists concede that this Eosinopteryx specimen might have lacked pennaceous tail and leg feathers because it was moulting when it perished, but, based on other features, they argue that the fossil faithfully preserves the dinosaur’s true plumage. The fact that Eosinopteryx had comparatively short arms and uncurved toe claws is consistent with a life spent scurrying over the ground rather than flapping through the air.

Of course, the plumage, relationships, and behavior of Eosinopteryx are all hypotheses that are open to testing. Paleontologists aren’t totally agreed on the usefulness of bone fusion alone to estimate the ages of dinosaurs, and claw shape isn’t necessarily a good indicator of preferred habitat or natural history. The most controversial aspect of the new study may not be the behavior or age of Eosinopteryx, though, but the feathered dinosaur family tree the researchers recovered.

The evolutionary tree, created by comparing subtle traits of various dinosaurs and early birds with each other to discern relationships, found that the famous Archaeopteryx wasn’t actually an early bird, but an archaic deinonychosaur – the larger group that contains troodontids like Anchiornis and dromaeosaurids such as Velociraptor. This placement echoes the results of a controversial study, published in Nature in 2011, which proposed that Archaeopteryx, Anchiornis, and Xiaotingia formed a distinct subgroup of feathered dinosaurs that was further removed from bird ancestry than traditionally thought.

Does this mean that we should stop calling Archaeopteryx the earliest known bird? Not necessarily. “[T]his phylogeny remains only weakly supported,” Godefroit and coauthors caution, and the paleontologists point out that convergent evolution among small, feathered dinosaurs might obscure the true pattern of relationships between the feathered forms. The identity of Archaeopteryx is being questioned, and rightly so, but paleontologists have yet to fully resolve which particular lineage of dinosaur spawned the first birds.

Birds are a special lineage of coelurosaurian dinosaurs. That is a fact. But the details of when and how that transition occurred, not to mention exactly from whom, are still areas of active debate. Eosinopteryx underscores the increasingly complex pattern of feathered dinosaur evolution and bird origins. The tiny dinosaur is another point of reference in an ongoing discussion about when dinosaurs took to the air, and which particular lineage left avian heirs to the Mesozoic legacy.

[The restoration of Eosinopteryx above was created by Emily Willoughby. Check out her artwork here.]

Godefroit, P., Demuynck, H., Dyke, G., Hu, D., Escuillie, F., Claeys, P. 2013. Reduced plumage and flight ability of a new Jurassic paravian theropod from China. Nature Communications. 4, 1394. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2389

Iguanodon

A genus of ornithopod dinosaur that existed roughly halfway between the first of the swift bipedal hypsilophodontids of the mid-Jurassic and the ornithopods’ culmination in the duck-billed dinosaurs of the late Cretaceous.

While many species have been classified in the genus Iguanodon, dating from the late Jurassic Period to the late Cretaceous Period of Asia, Europe, and North America, research in the first decade of the 21st century suggests that there is only one well-substantiated species: I. bernissartensis, which lived from the late Barremian to the earliest Aptian ages (Early Cretaceous) in Belgium and possibly elsewhere in Europe, between about 126 and 125 million years ago.

Iguanodon were large, bulky herbivores. Distinctive features include large thumb spikes, which were possibly used for defence against predators, combined with long prehensile fifth fingers able to forage for food.

biocanvas:

Dinosaur bone cells from the Morrison Formation in Utah that have been petrified with silica and quartz crystals. The Morrison Formation features dinosaur fossils dating back to the Late Jurassic period.

Image by Douglas Moore, University of Wisconsin.

paleoillustration:

Antarctic Australasia, by John Sibbick

(via ikenbot)

nbcnews:

Earliest dinosaur to walk Earth believed discovered

(Photo: Natural History Museum, London / Mark Witton)

A wonky beast about the size of a Labrador retriever with a long neck and lengthy tail may be the world’s earliest known dinosaur, say researchers who analyzed fossilized bones discovered in Tanzania in the 1930s.

(via ikenbot)

gdfalksen:

Hatzegopteryx had a wingspan of about 10 metres - making it one of the largest known flying animals of all time.
This can be a little hard to visualize, so check this image out. Despite its size, Hatzegopteryx’s hollow skeleton means that the pterosaur only weighs about 1/6 as much as the giraffe.

Image courtesy of Mark Witton, atwww.markwitton.com

(via ikenbot)

Oceans in 2100 May ‘Sound’ Like Dinosaur-Era Seas

Scuba divers in the year 2100 might hear what the dinosaurs did, new research suggests.

Rising acidity in the oceans could set underwater acoustic conditions back to the Cretaceous period, scientists say, allowing some low-frequency sounds like whale songs to travel perhaps twice as far as they do now.

“We call it the Cretaceous acoustic effect, because ocean acidification forced by global warming appears to be leading us back to the similar ocean acoustic conditions as those that existed 110 million years ago, during the Age of Dinosaurs,” David G. Browning, an acoustician at the University of Rhode Island, said in a statement.