Science is the poetry of Nature.
Contributing Authors
Posts tagged "Physics"

mucholderthen:

Illustration
the visible spectrum as part of the electromagnetic spectrum
(Credit:  Abrisa Glass & Coatings, 2005)

X-rays, light, and radio waves are examples of electromagnetic waves.

Light is what we call the part of the electromagnetic spectrum that we can detect with our eyes. The cone photoreceptors in our eyes have evolved so that they are most sensitive at different regions of the visible spectrum. This forms the basis for our sensation of color 

At the blue end of the visible spectrum, the wavelength of light is shorter — about 400 nanometers.

A nanometer is 1 billionth of a meter, or 1 × 10−9 meter.  The abbreviation for nanometer is ‘nm’.

At the red end of the spectrum, the wavelength of light is longer — about 700 nm.

Cone photoreceptors have evolved into three different types. Each one is most sensitive to a different region of the visible spectrum. One type responds best to shorter wavelengths; another responds best to wavelengths towards the middle of the spectrum; and the third type responds best to longer wavelengths.

The different cone photoreceptors are not sharply tuned to a particular color, however. So a short-wavelength cone photoreceptor can still respond to longer-wavelength light that falls on it. It is more likely to respond to shorter wavelength light, but it is still possible for it to respond to mid- and long-wavelength light.

The signals from the three different types of cones are combined in the retina and in the brain, eventually giving rise to the sensation of color.

[ via Mixing Light ]

Physicists Find Way to Measure Earth’s Rarest Element

A fundamental property of the rarest element on Earth, astatine, has been discovered for the first time, scientists say.
Astatine occurs naturally; however, scientists estimate much less than an ounce in total exists worldwide. For a long time, the characteristics of this elusive element were a mystery, but physicists at the CERN physics laboratory in Switzerland have now measured its ionization potential — the amount of energy needed to remove one electron from an atom of astatine, turning it into an ion or a charged particle.
The measurement fills in a missing piece of the periodic table of elements, because astatine was the last naturally occurring element for which this property was unknown. Astatine, which has 85 protons and 85 electrons per atom, is radioactive, and half of its most stable version decays in just 8.1 hours, a time called half-life. In 1953, Isaac Asimov estimated the worldwide total of astatine in nature was 0.002 ounces (0.07 grams).

Full Article

Physicists Find Way to Measure Earth’s Rarest Element

A fundamental property of the rarest element on Earth, astatine, has been discovered for the first time, scientists say.

Astatine occurs naturally; however, scientists estimate much less than an ounce in total exists worldwide. For a long time, the characteristics of this elusive element were a mystery, but physicists at the CERN physics laboratory in Switzerland have now measured its ionization potential — the amount of energy needed to remove one electron from an atom of astatine, turning it into an ion or a charged particle.

The measurement fills in a missing piece of the periodic table of elements, because astatine was the last naturally occurring element for which this property was unknown. Astatine, which has 85 protons and 85 electrons per atom, is radioactive, and half of its most stable version decays in just 8.1 hours, a time called half-life. In 1953, Isaac Asimov estimated the worldwide total of astatine in nature was 0.002 ounces (0.07 grams).

Full Article

Barns Are Painted Red Because of the Physics of Dying Stars

Have you ever noticed that almost every barn you have ever seen is red? There’s a reason for that, and it has to do with the chemistry of dying stars. Seriously.

Yonatan Zunger is a Google employee who decided to explain this phenomenon on Google+ recently. The simple answer to why barns are painted red is because red paint is cheap. The cheapest paint there is, in fact. But the reason it’s so cheap? Well, that’s the interesting part.

Red ochre—Fe2O3—is a simple compound of iron and oxygen that absorbs yellow, green and blue light and appears red. It’s what makes red paint red. It’s really cheap because it’s really plentiful. And it’s really plentiful because of nuclear fusion in dying stars. Zunger explains:

The only thing holding the star up was the energy of the fusion reactions, so as power levels go down, the star starts to shrink. And as it shrinks, the pressure goes up, and the temperature goes up, until suddenly it hits a temperature where a new reaction can get started. These new reactions give it a big burst of energy, but start to form heavier elements still, and so the cycle gradually repeats, with the star reacting further and further up the periodic table, producing more and more heavy elements as it goes. Until it hits 56. At that point, the reactions simply stop producing energy at all; the star shuts down and collapses without stopping.

As soon as the star hits the 56 nucleon (total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus) cutoff, it falls apart. It doesn’t make anything heavier than 56. What does this have to do with red paint? Because the star stops at 56, it winds up making a ton of things with 56 neucleons. It makes more 56 nucleon containing things than anything else (aside from the super light stuff in the star that is too light to fuse).

The element that has 56 protons and neutrons in its nucleus in its stable state? Iron. The stuff that makes red paint.

And that, Zunger explains, is how the death of a star determines what color barns are painted.

New Plasma Device Considered Holy Grail of Energy Generation

Scientists at the University of Missouri have devised a new way to create and control plasma that could transform American energy generation and storage.

Randy Curry, professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Missouri’s College of Engineering, and his team developed a device that launches a ring of plasma at distances of up to two feet. Although the plasma reaches a temperature hotter than the surface of the sun, it doesn’t emit radiation and is completely safe in proximity to humans.

While most of us are familiar with three states of matter – liquid, gas and solid – there is also a fourth state known as plasma, which includes things such as fire and lightning. Life on Earth depends on the energy emitted by plasma produced during fusion reactions within the sun.

The secret to Curry’s success was developing a way to make plasma form its own self-magnetic field, which holds it together as it travels through the air.

“Launching plasma in open air is the ‘Holy Grail’ in the field of physics,” said Curry.

“Creating plasma in a vacuum tube surrounded by powerful electromagnets is no big deal; dozens of labs can do that. Our innovation allows the plasma to hold itself together while it travels through regular air without any need for containment.”

The plasma device could also be enlarged to handle much larger amounts of energy, he said.

Ask a grown-up: is there anything smaller than an atom?

Cern scientist Jon Butterworth answers eight-year-old Adam’s question

Yes, and we use them every day. Electrons are one of the things inside atoms and we are very used to seeing them move around when an electric current flows. They have been known about for more than 100 years.

We have something called the standard model of physics, which is a list of things that are not made of anything else – in other words, the smallest things we know of. That list includes quarks, gluons, electrons and neutrinos. Then there are the forces that join those things up: light is one of them. Light is carried by little particles called photons. And there is the Higgs boson particle, which we found last year, which is also smaller than an atom.

It does still boggle my mind. You know the maths of particle physics but while the maths is elegant and beautiful, it feels completely other to everyday life. When we built the Large Hadron Collider and actually saw the Higgs boson particle in action, it was amazing.

This beautiful video showcasing the behaviour of magnetic putty is strangely soothing, which isn’t a bad thing right about now. Via Colossal.

Dark Lightning Zaps Airline Passengers

You’ve probably never seen it, but it’s possible you’ve been exposed to it if you’ve ever flown through a thunderstorm. Dark lightning, flashes of gamma rays that occur at altitudes in which commercial aircraft fly, doesn’t produce much light, but it does produce radiation.

New research presented Wednesday at a meeting of the European Geosciences Union in Vienna pinpoints the amount of radiation that dark lightning produces — and how much pilots and passengers might be getting exposed to.

“The good news is that the doses are not super scary — it could be worse,” said lead research Joseph Dwyer, a physics professor at Florida Institute of Technology. “It’s similar to going to the doctor’s office and getting a CT scan.”

The existence of dark lightning itself was discovered on a NASA spacecraft in 1994. In the electrical fields of a thunderstorm, electrons zoom close to the speed of light, colliding with atoms to emit the gamma rays.

In 2010, Dwyer and colleagues determined that dark lightning occurred at altitudes where airplanes commonly fly. That prompted the current work, which involved a physics-based model that can show exactly how the discharge happens.

The preliminary work showed how much radiation was being emitted, but the size of the space it was produced in was unclear. With the current model, Dwyer’s team was able to pinpoint the exposure dose that someone on an airplane would likely receive.

“This work is very important because it gets you into the zone where you start to understand how often and how likely they are to happen,” said University of California Santa Cruz physics professor David Smith, who has worked with Dwyer but was not involved in the modeling work.

The next step, Smith said, is to start determining how often the flashes occur. Because the bursts are so brief — about 10-100 of microseconds — they are usually undetected, although it’s possible you could see a diffuse, purple light, Dwyer said.

“Unless you have gamma ray detectors on board, no one would think anything of it,” Smith said.

The National Science Foundation is currently working on an armored plane that could fly through thunderstorms, Smith said. If an instrument were placed on board, researchers may begin to get a better idea of the frequency of the flashes. Currently, the bursts are thought to occur much less frequently than the lightning we see, but that could mean anywhere from 1/100th to 1/1000th as often, Smith said.

“It’s a very rough number,” Smith said. “The other question is, are there somewhat weaker ones that happen more often?”

Until those questions are answered, researchers say there’s no need for pilots to change course, since avoiding thunderstorms is already part of the gig. Depending on future findings, though, frequent flyers may want to watch the weather when they fly.

“It’s kind of cool that it’s been 250 years since Benjamin Franklin’s kite experiment, and we’ve realized there’s a different kind of lightning going on that we never knew about,” Dwyer said.

Full Article

(via abluegirl)

Solid or Liquid? Physicists Redefine States of Matter

Why can you stand on a glacier but not the ocean?

The answer seems simple enough: Liquids flow. Solids don’t. The atoms in liquids can slosh around. In solids, they fall lockstep into a crystal lattice. A crystal’s endlessly repeating pattern is so stable that it takes a considerable infusion of energy to make the atoms break rank. Or so physics textbooks say.

But this long-accepted explanation for the rigidity of solids fails to account for quasicrystals — bizarre solids first discovered in the lab in 1982 and found in nature in 2009. Atoms in quasicrystals are arranged in patterns that never repeat, but the material is nonetheless rigid. So is glass, an amorphous mass of stationary atoms that behaves like a solid but, upon closer inspection, looks more like a liquid frozen in time.

“Glasses have been around for thousands of years,” said Daniel Stein, a professor of physics and mathematics at New York University. “Chemists understand them. Engineers understand them. From the point of view of physics, we don’t understand them. Why are they rigid?”

Even crystalline solids such as glaciers resist categorization, as their atoms can flow, albeit very slowly. And sometimes the reverse also seems true: The ocean feels rigid if you jump onto it from a tall enough glacier. What, then, is the difference between a liquid and a solid?

Physicists in France and the United States are proposing new answers to this fundamental question. As outlined in a March article in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society, the researchers have identified two characteristics of materials that dramatically change form at the intersections of temperature and pressure where liquids turn solid. These characteristics, the physicists say, could define the difference between the two states of matter.

Charles Radin, a mathematical physicist at the University of Texas at Austin, and his former student, David Aristoff, now a mathematician at the University of Minnesota, argue that the main difference between liquids and solids is the way they respond to shear, or twisting forces. Liquids barely resist shear and can easily be sloshed, whereas solids — regardless of whether they are crystals, quasicrystals or glass — resist attempts to change their shape.

The liquid-solid phase transition, Radin and Aristoff reason, should therefore be marked by the “shear response” of a material jumping from zero to a positive value. And they observed just such a jump for a two-dimensional model material, in which atoms are represented by disks: At low densities corresponding to the material’s liquid phase, it showed no response to shear, but when the disks were densely packed, like the atoms in a solid, shear caused the material to expand. “The crossover where it shows this effect is exactly the density where the system becomes crystalline,” Radin said. “We propose this as a different way of understanding what a solid is.”

Full Article

Detectors zero in on Earth’s heat: Geoneutrinos paint picture of deep-mantle processes.

A window on the deep Earth opened unexpectedly in 2011, when Japan’s nuclear reactors were shut down after the Fukushima disaster. Before the closure, an underground particle detector called KamLAND based in Kamioka, Japan, was monitoring a torrent of neutrinos streaming from dozens of nearby nuclear reactors, seeking clues to the nature of these hard-to-catch subatomic particles. After those plants fell silent, KamLAND scientists could see more clearly a signal that had largely been obscured: a faint trickle of neutrinos produced inside the planet.

Neutrinos are generated in stars, reactors, and deep in Earth’s crust and mantle by the radio­active decay of elements such as uranium and thorium. KamLAND reported the first tentative detections of these ‘geoneutrinos’ in 2005 (ref.1). But last month at a conference in Takayama, Japan, KamLAND scientists reported seeing them in meaningful quantities — as did a team at the Borexino neutrino detector at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory near L’Aquila, Italy.

These detections are not just curiosities. Geoneutrinos offer the only way to measure one of Earth’s internal heat sources. The total heat flow, measured with sensors in deep mines and amounting to 47 terawatts (TW) of power, drives everything from plate tectonics to Earth’s magnetic field. Some of it comes from the decay of radioactive elements, the rest is primordial heat left over from when Earth was formed by the violent collision of planetary building blocks.

But no one knows the proportions. Geologists assume that Earth contains the same amount of radioactive elements as certain primitive meteorites, but they aren’t sure. “We’re after trying to understand how Earth was built,” says William McDonough, a geologist at the University of Maryland in College Park.

Ultimately, geoneutrino researchers would like multiple detectors spaced around Earth, so that they could perform a sort of tomography on the mantle. That could help scientists to discern between models that favour the uranium and thorium being spread throughout the mantle, versus those in which the elements are concentrated near the core–mantle boundary. Such a difference could help to determine where and how long heat will continue to flow to drive geological processes such as plate tectonics — and how long it will take Earth to cool.

Full Article

abluegirl:

Dark Matter Signal Possibly Registered on International Space Station:

A $2-billion particle detector mounted on the International Space Station has registered an excess of antimatter particles in space, the experiment’s lead scientist announced April 3. That excess could come from fast-spinning stellar remnants known as pulsars and other exotic, but visible sources within the Milky Way galaxy. Or the antiparticles might have originated from the long-sought dark matter, the hypothetical massive particles that constitute some 27 percent of the universe.

Full Article

This is really exciting news, because up until now scientists have been unable to directly observe dark matter.  Dark matter is really important. Not only is there four times more of it than regular matter, but due to the gravitational force it exerts on galaxies, it plays an important role in galaxy formation and in determining the structure of the universe itself. Yet, scientists still aren’t really sure what it is, exactly. Gaining direct evidence of its existence goes a long way to figuring that out.

Just keep in mind that dark matter is one possible reason for these results there are of reasons to be suspicious of any conclusions that are drawn from them.

In an unprecedented gesture in the history of particle physics, Sergio Bertolucci, Director of Research, announced this morning that CERN is going to do something unusual: give away fundamental particles.

“Given the interest manifested over the past years by the general public for the Higgs boson search, we felt that we had to give some back as a token of appreciation”, said Dr Bertolucci. “As CERN, we have always believed in sharing the results of our research, and the time has come to make that tangible. This is our way of saying thanks for the incredible level of enthusiasm that has greeted this discovery”. The new particle’s discovery was announced at a special seminar on 4 July last year.

Both the ATLAS and CMS experiments have generously accepted to donate some of their precious Higgs bosons. Particles such as Higgs bosons are created from the energy released in proton-proton collisions in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). However, Higgs bosons are extremely rare, being created only once out of one million million such collisions.

“We hope the lucky few who will receive a Higgs boson will cherish them as much as we do”, said Dr Bertolucci.

Each boson will come with a complete set of instructions on how to properly care for it. To enter this lottery, please send an e-mail to Higgs.lottery@cern.ch. A Higgs boson will be sent to the ten lucky winners chosen randomly from all requests received within 24 hours of publishing this post.

Neil deGrasse Tyson on the person he considers the greatest physicist in history, Sir Issac Newton:

The man was connected the universe in ways that I’ve never seen another human being connected. Kinda spooky, actually.

Via Open Culture.

abluegirl:

Happy Easter to those who celebrate it! If you find yourself with a surplus of peeps or other marshmallow-based treats today, might I suggest experimentation?  Smithsonian.com has outlined three  experiments that can demonstrate the principles of physics using marshmallows:

  • marshmallows in a vacuum - demonstrating Boyle’s law, which states that the relationship between pressure and the volume of a gas is inversely proportional when temperature remains the same
  • marshmallows in a microwave - demonstrating Charles’ law, showing the relationship between temperature of a gas and its volume.
  • Measure the speed of light using marshmallows, a measuring stick and a microwave.

I would try them, but my kids won’t give up any of the peeps. Might have to go acquire some peeps of my own. For science.